<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PageRank sculpting and rel=nofollow debate rages on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/2009/07/the-pagerank-sculpting-and-rel-nofollow-debate-rages-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/2009/07/the-pagerank-sculpting-and-rel-nofollow-debate-rages-on/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Blog posting on topics including Search Engine Marketing, Online PR, Social Media, Conversion Optimisation and Brand Engagement</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clapham</title>
		<link>http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/2009/07/the-pagerank-sculpting-and-rel-nofollow-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clapham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,

That's a fair point and I guess it’s dependant on the type of site and what is included in the terms and conditions, which should decide it’s importance. If you are an ecommerce site for example then it's a legal requirement to clearly display your website terms and conditions under the ecommerce directive (http://www.ekmpowershop.com/support/articles/legalrequirementsforecommerce.asp). However, you could you noindex/disallow it if you didn’t want it to appear in the search results.  

Thanks, Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a fair point and I guess it’s dependant on the type of site and what is included in the terms and conditions, which should decide it’s importance. If you are an ecommerce site for example then it&#8217;s a legal requirement to clearly display your website terms and conditions under the ecommerce directive (http://www.ekmpowershop.com/support/articles/legalrequirementsforecommerce.asp). However, you could you noindex/disallow it if you didn’t want it to appear in the search results.  </p>
<p>Thanks, Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/2009/07/the-pagerank-sculpting-and-rel-nofollow-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Chris, are you sure there is any real benifit in linking to pages such as terms and conditions. After all, as most of the information on terms and conditions etc is standardised, why would you wish to link to it? Regardless of pagerank flow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, are you sure there is any real benifit in linking to pages such as terms and conditions. After all, as most of the information on terms and conditions etc is standardised, why would you wish to link to it? Regardless of pagerank flow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/2009/07/the-pagerank-sculpting-and-rel-nofollow-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I think that was the response I was expecting - although I figure you still need to be careful in not having three links to three different fragments - the link would need consolidating as well as the page (which isn't made clear (at least to me) in the seomoz article).

Attentive to the recent effort put into this redesign / new site, I will watch closely to see your changes in response to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that was the response I was expecting - although I figure you still need to be careful in not having three links to three different fragments - the link would need consolidating as well as the page (which isn&#8217;t made clear (at least to me) in the seomoz article).</p>
<p>Attentive to the recent effort put into this redesign / new site, I will watch closely to see your changes in response to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clapham</title>
		<link>http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/2009/07/the-pagerank-sculpting-and-rel-nofollow-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clapham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob,

One solution to manage linkflow juice would be to consolidate all those lower order pages like privacy and terms &amp; conditions onto one single page. SEOmoz summed this up well on a recent blog post, which is worth reading &gt;&gt; http://www.seomoz.org/blog/link-consolidation-the-new-pagerank-sculpting.

It would be interesting to hear what solution you had in mind, if it's different to the consolidating pages solution.

Thanks, Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,</p>
<p>One solution to manage linkflow juice would be to consolidate all those lower order pages like privacy and terms &amp; conditions onto one single page. SEOmoz summed this up well on a recent blog post, which is worth reading &gt;&gt; <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/link-consolidation-the-new-pagerank-sculpting" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/link-consolidation-the-new-pagerank-sculpting</a>.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to hear what solution you had in mind, if it&#8217;s different to the consolidating pages solution.</p>
<p>Thanks, Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/2009/07/the-pagerank-sculpting-and-rel-nofollow-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propellernet.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I *think* I know the answer, but what would you suggest as the method to manage linkjuice flow to/around contact/terms/privacy pages?

I can't help but notice that you are nofollowing nine internal links on this page ( excluding the one that you'll probably use for my URL above)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I *think* I know the answer, but what would you suggest as the method to manage linkjuice flow to/around contact/terms/privacy pages?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but notice that you are nofollowing nine internal links on this page ( excluding the one that you&#8217;ll probably use for my URL above)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
